Hire the Right
Real Estate
Agent
When a friend or family member has a real estate license you should be careful. A professional is needed, so stick to tough standards. Money can quickly separate family or friends. Relationships can easily be damaged. How much of your personal business do you want family and friends to know? Even when you decide that if I can not trust this person, who can I trust, you need to be careful. I have seen even in immediate family, where when two are working that close together, that personal traits which would otherwise not be noticed, became a point of dissention.
Don’t be fooled by slick presentation, talk about how big the company is, or how much the agent has sold, the size of the commission, the size of the proposed selling price, or the fact that the agent lives in the neighborhood. There are times that when the agent knows too much about the neighborhood that there could be conflicting interests. Conflicting interests also come into play when the agent represents both the seller and the buyer. You need someone that you are comfortable working with and that may not be the agent that has sold the most. Personalities can play a huge role when people need to work together and understand each other. If the agent is big enough to have a team, you should be meeting the team members that you will deal with. Knowledge of marketing and understanding how to take advantage of what the market is presently doing are huge factors. Selling price should be either high, low, or in the middle according to the market plan you choose. A single marketing plan will not be correct for all neighborhoods.
Remember, buying or selling your home is probably one of the largest monetary transactions that the family will do. Use a Professional Realtor. If you are not comfortable with me, allow me to recommend an agent. Do you do your own dental work, surgery, etc? I admire you and will support you when you give it a try on your own.
If the relationship between the agent and client does not work, say something. The agent depends on that mutual communication. However, if it is unworkable many agents and broker will make arrangements to have you represented by someone else in the office.
The seller’s agent should: The Buyer’s agent should:
Get the highest price Get the lowest price.
Negotiate terms for the seller. Negotiate terms for the buyer.
Assist the seller. Assist the buyer.
Seek purchasers. Find property to the buyer’s criteria.
Protect the seller’s position. Protect the buyer’s position.
I am always amazed by those who drive around and call the name and number on a real estate sign. The same agent can not represent both parties. Hire a Buyer's agent. It does not cost you. The commission is paid by the seller in Missouri. Ask your agent if he will do Dual Agency. If the person says yes, how do they avoid compromise of one or the other or both.
Do you
fully understand
the pros and
cons of holding
joint-tenancy
title?
THE
PRIMARY
JOINT-TENANCY
ADVANTAGES.
To be legally
correct,
joint-tenancy
real estate
ownership means
"joint tenancy
with right of
survivorship." A
few states
require use of
those exact
words on the
deed. But in
most states,
"joint tenancy"
is sufficient.
Survivorship
means the joint
tenant who
outlives the
joint tenant
co-owner(s)
automatically
receives the
deceased's share
of the property
without probate
court costs or
delays. Probate
court avoidance
is considered
the major
joint-tenancy
advantage.
All that is
usually
necessary to
clear the title
of a deceased
joint tenant's
name is to
record a
certified copy
of the death
certificate and
an affidavit of
survivorship
with the local
recorder of
deeds.
The will of a
deceased joint
tenant has no
effect on their
joint-tenancy
property.
However, joint
tenants still
need a written
will. In the
event of
simultaneous
death of all the
joint tenants,
such as in a
plane crash, the
will of each
deceased joint
tenant
determines who
receives their
share of the
property.
Or, in the
unlikely event
one joint tenant
kills another
joint tenant,
the wrongdoer
cannot receive
the deceased
joint tenant's
share by
survivorship so
the deceased
joint tenant's
will then
becomes
important.
Although
joint tenancy
usually involves
two co-owners,
such as husband
and wife, there
can be an
unlimited number
of joint
tenants. But
they all must
take title at
the same time by
the same deed,
and they all own
equal shares.
For example,
suppose John and
Mary Buyer
purchase their
home as joint
tenants. Each
therefore owns a
50 percent
share. However,
when their
daughter, Suzy,
becomes 18 they
decide to add
her as an
additional joint
tenant.
To add Suzy
to the title,
John and Mary
sign and record
a quitclaim deed
from themselves
to John, Mary
and Suzy as
joint tenants
with right of
survivorship.
The result is
each of the
three joint
tenants now own
a one-third
interest in the
home.
TENANCY BY
THE ENTIRETIES
FOR MARRIED
COUPLES. In
24 states, a
husband and wife
can hold title
as tenants by
the entireties,
which is very
similar to joint
tenancy.
However, neither
spouse can
convey their
tenancy by
entirety share
without the
other spouse's
signature.
This
ownership form
overcomes the
joint-tenancy
disadvantage
that one joint
tenant can
transfer his/her
share without
approval of the
other joint
tenant(s), thus
breaking up the
joint tenancy
and creating a
tenancy in
common.
Tenancy by
the entireties
for husband and
wife is allowed
in Alaska,
Arkansas,
Delaware,
Florida, Hawaii,
Indiana,
Kentucky,
Maryland,
Massachusetts,
Michigan,
Mississippi,
Missouri, New
Jersey, New
York, North
Carolina, Ohio,
Oklahoma,
Oregon,
Pennsylvania,
Tennessee,
Vermont,
Virginia,
Wyoming, and the
District of
Columbia.
SEVEN PROS
AND CONS OF
JOINT TENANCY.
Before
consulting your
attorney or
other trusted
adviser to
determine if
joint tenancy
with right of
survivorship
(JTWRS) is right
for your
situation, it
pays to know the
pros and cons:
1. A JOINT
TENANT'S WILL
DOES NOT AFFECT
JTWRS PROPERTY.
Except for
joint-tenancy
simultaneous
death or murder
situations, a
written will has
no effect on
JTWRS property.
Especially in
second
marriages, where
each spouse
often wants to
leave their half
of the property
to children of
their first
marriage, better
alternatives
might be holding
title in a
revocable living
trust or as
tenants in
common.
2. PROBATE
COSTS AND DELAYS
ARE AVOIDED.
When a joint
tenant dies, his
or her share
automatically
passes to the
surviving joint
tenant(s)
without probate
court
interference.
This is
considered the
major
joint-tenancy
advantage.
3. JOINT
TENANT'S SHARE
CAN BE ATTACHED
BY JUDGMENT
CREDITORS.
Unknown to most
joint tenants,
judgment
creditors of one
joint tenant can
attach that
person's share
of the property.
Or, if a joint
tenant files
bankruptcy and
there is
sufficient
equity in the
property, the
bankruptcy court
can order the
property sold
with the
proceeds divided
among the
co-owners.
However,
after a joint
tenant dies,
creditors cannot
attach the
deceased's
share, which
automatically
passed to the
surviving joint
tenants.
4. IN A
PARTITION
LAWSUIT, ONE
JOINT TENANT CAN
FORCE A SALE OF
THE PROPERTY.
In most states,
one joint tenant
co-owner can
bring a
partition
lawsuit to force
a sale of the
property. The
same result
applies to
tenants in
common.
5. ALL
JOINT TENANTS
CAN OCCUPY AND
MANAGE THE
PROPERTY.
Although each
joint tenant has
the right to
occupy and
manage the
property, this
can become a
problem if one
joint tenant
refuses to pay
his or her share
of the property
expenses.
However, if
one joint tenant
pays all the
expenses, there
is a right of
reimbursement
for necessary
costs, such as
property taxes.
If a joint
tenant is under
18, a minor
cannot convey
title or pay
their share of
the property
expenses unless
represented by a
court-appointed
guardian. For
this reason,
minors should
usually not be
added to the
title as joint
tenants.
Similarly, if
a joint tenant
becomes
incapacitated,
such as with
Alzheimer's
disease or a
severe stroke, a
court-appointed
conservator
might be
necessary to
represent the
incapacitated
joint tenant.
However, this
problem can be
avoided if title
is held in a
revocable living
trust instead of
joint tenancy.
6.
APPROVAL OF
CO-OWNERS IS NOT
NEEDED TO BREAK
UP A JOINT
TENANCY.
Except for
tenancy by the
entireties
between husband
and wife, one
joint tenant can
secretly convey
his/her share to
a third party,
thus breaking up
the joint
tenancy and
creating a
tenancy in
common.
The most
famous court
decision on this
issue is the
1980 decision in
Riddle v.
Harmon (162
Cal.Rptr. 530).
Shortly before
her death, the
wife secretly
conveyed by a
quitclaim deed
her
joint-tenancy
share to herself
as a tenant in
common. After
her death, the
surviving
husband presumed
he owned the
entire property
as the surviving
joint tenant.
But the court
ruled the late
wife's secret
deed to herself
as a tenant in
common made her
half of the
property subject
to her will,
which left her
assets to a
third party. The
widower husband
retained his 50
percent share as
a tenant in
common.
7.
NON-SIMULTANEOUS
DEATH OF JOINT
TENANTS CREATES
UNINTENDED
RESULTS.
When all joint
tenants die at
the same time
and the order of
death cannot be
determined, such
as in a plane
crash, the share
of each deceased
joint tenant
then passes
according to
his/her written
will (or by the
state law of
intestate
succession if no
will is found).
However, if
one joint tenant
survives the
other for just a
short time, his
or her heirs
receive the
entire property.
That happened a
few years ago in
Berkeley, Calif.
Joint-tenant
property owners
Larry and his
girlfriend Lana
were on an
evening walk. A
drive-by
shooter's
bullets hit both
Larry and Lana.
They were
rushed to a
nearby hospital
where Lana died
at 2:58 a.m.
Larry was kept
alive on a
ventilator until
4:55 a.m. when
he died. Because
Larry survived
Lana, he was the
surviving joint
tenant of their
properties. His
heirs inherited
all the
joint-tenancy
property under
his will and
Lana's relatives
received nothing
because she was
not the
surviving joint
tenant.
CONCLUSION:
Although holding
title as joint
tenants (or
tenancy by the
entireties
between husband
and wife where
allowed) offers
many benefits,
it also provides
possible
disadvantages.
Other
co-ownership
alternatives to
be considered
include tenants
in common and
revocable living
trusts.
Consultation
with your
attorney and tax
adviser is
recommended.
|